Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahaguru
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Mahaguru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This has been tagged for notability for 9 years. I was unable to verify that it meets WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 17:40, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Alts:
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- AND WP:INDAFD
- Delete No coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NFILM. If this article gets deleted, then Mahaguru (2007 film) could be moved to this title, but actually that film appears to fail the notability guidelines as well, so I will nominate it for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This film is a notable Bollywood film of actor Rajinikanth as hero.Rajeshbieee (talk) 10:01, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - This simply is not covered in significant secondary sources. The lone keep vote is unconvincing; how can it be a notable Bollywood film if it did not receive coverage?TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.